Project Borderless
One event, every side. Neutral coverage of US politics.
Every big story gets told differently depending on who is covering it. Figuring out what actually happened, versus how it is being spun, means reading five outlets and coming away exhausted.
I wanted to read the news without picking a side: the facts everyone agrees on in one place, and the loaded language each side uses made obvious.
- Clusters coverage of a single event from left, center, and right outlets, with each outlet's lean labeled from published methodologies (AllSides, Ad Fontes), not my opinion.
- Separates the shared facts everyone reports from how each side frames them.
- A daily email digest and a full, searchable archive.
The real value here is the pattern, not the topic, and it travels. A few ways the same idea could work for something of yours:
Any polarized topic
The same side-by-side treatment for a divisive issue in your field or community.
Media monitoring
Show a team how a story, or a competitor, is being framed across different sources.
Any compare-the-sources tool
Anywhere the value is neutrality and making bias visible.
Want a version of this for your own idea? That's a great first conversation.
Let's talk